hasselbladdigitalforum.com
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 22, 2012, 03:23:52 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
My Hasselblad related blog is now hosted here:
http://blog.hasselbladdigitalforum.com/
13546
Posts in
2050
Topics by
1557
Members
Latest Member:
d7ig32j983
hasselbladdigitalforum.com
Hasselblad Digital Forum Public Portal
Prospective Purchasers
Is a Hasselblad H3DII-31 good enough?
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Is a Hasselblad H3DII-31 good enough? (Read 774 times)
pjtn
Basic Member
Member
Offline
Posts: 6
Is a Hasselblad H3DII-31 good enough?
«
on:
February 07, 2012, 03:02:57 AM »
I'm looking at second hand Hasselblad H3DII-31 cameras for doing long exposure black and white landscape photographs. The exposures last for around 2 to 10 minutes. I want to print these files up to 40x40" square and I'm wondering whether this camera would be able to do that and still retain sharp and fine detail upon reasonably close inspection.
I'm not really in an area where I can get hold of one to test it out. I have though demoed a Pentax 645D recently and found it quite adequate for the task.
«
Last Edit: February 07, 2012, 08:02:02 AM by pjtn
»
Logged
pjtn
Basic Member
Member
Offline
Posts: 6
Re: Hasselblad H3DII-31 for 40x40" long exposure landscapes?
«
Reply #1 on:
February 07, 2012, 07:43:55 AM »
Also, I've been told that the H3DII-31 can't do exposures over 32 seconds, is this true? Doesn't it have a bulb mode so that a remote shutter release can be used for long exposures?
Logged
jonathan.lipkin
Full Member
Member
Offline
Posts: 29
Re: Is a Hasselblad H3DII-31 good enough?
«
Reply #2 on:
February 13, 2012, 08:32:38 PM »
I just looked on my h3d 39 and could set the esposire to one minute, but didnt see any setting for bulb ot t. from what ive heard, digital capptures get very noisy when long exposures used. If you want me to check a setting for you, let me know.
Ive made forty two by six prints from mine and they were quite sharp.
«
Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 08:35:53 PM by jonathan.lipkin
»
Logged
Jeff
Full Member
Member
Online
Posts: 555
Re: Is a Hasselblad H3DII-31 good enough?
«
Reply #3 on:
February 13, 2012, 09:17:53 PM »
An H3D II 39 at 64 second is noiseless for all practical purposes. I don't know about the 31 but expect that it would be the same. An H4D 40 is also noiseless at 256 seconds. This is premised on the use of Phocus. I have no idea how LR or ACR would go.
Logged
Cheers,
Jeff
www.jeff-grant.com
jonathan.lipkin
Full Member
Member
Offline
Posts: 29
Re: Is a Hasselblad H3DII-31 good enough?
«
Reply #4 on:
February 15, 2012, 10:49:31 PM »
Jeff - how did you get your camera to make long exposures? I didn't see anything in the manual about it, and couldn't find a bulb or long exposure setting. Are you controlling the camera through Phocus.
And Phocus is a much better choice for _any_ conversion from raw using the Hasselblad, no matter what the situation.
Logged
Jeff
Full Member
Member
Online
Posts: 555
Re: Is a Hasselblad H3DII-31 good enough?
«
Reply #5 on:
February 15, 2012, 11:21:48 PM »
Jonathan, there is a Custom Option that hides B and T mode. It pops up between 1 and 1.4 seconds for some reason. I always use Aperture Priority so the camera sorts it out for me. The light meter is pretty flakey once you start using multiple second exposures. Actually my old PME45 did a better job. It can be a few stops out so you will need to experiment a bit to get it right.
Logged
Cheers,
Jeff
www.jeff-grant.com
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Hasselblad Digital Forum Public Portal
-----------------------------
=> About this site.
=> Help
=> Tips and Tricks
=> Prospective Purchasers
=> The lenses
Loading...