hasselbladdigitalforum.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 06, 2012, 05:26:51 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
My Hasselblad related blog is now hosted here:
http://blog.hasselbladdigitalforum.com/
12792 Posts in 1928 Topics by 1485 Members
Latest Member: abjnbhri2
* Home Help Login Register
+  hasselbladdigitalforum.com
|-+  Hasselblad Digital Forum Public Portal
| |-+  Help
| | |-+  Vertical banding on CFV-39
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Vertical banding on CFV-39  (Read 841 times)
rjanso1
Full Member
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


« on: July 07, 2010, 09:09:32 AM »

I have recently been shooting images that have bright highlights in otherwise dark image.
The high lights produce vertical purple lines in the image down from the highlight.
Can anyone explain what is happening and offer any possible way of avoiding these lines which make the image un-usable?
The vertical banding seems to be worse with some lenses like the CFE180mm.
Thanks
Logged
Monty Rakusen
Full Member
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 183



WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2010, 09:59:05 AM »

Yes I shoot quite a lot into the sun and you get a purple line running down the shot often with breakup near the light source. I'm sorry but there's no other way but to retouch. Its just the nature of photography, even on film the problem was similar, perhaps its a little worse with digital.

However your problem sounds worse and it would be useful to see a file. Maybe you have a dirty ir filter?

Monty
Logged
alexkent
Full Member
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 271


WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2010, 10:03:15 AM »

hi,
i might be entirely on the wrong track here, but with the old old old imacon 3020 back's on RZ bodies, if the camera shutter speed was set the same or faster than the backs' exposure time, we'd get crazy vertical streaking on every image.
i've not used a CFV-39 very much and i don't remember if you set the exposure time for the back separately to the shutter time on the body... if you do, this might be worth looking at. or, as i said, i might be barking up the wrong tree.

regards,

alex.
Logged
rjanso1
Full Member
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2010, 05:58:46 PM »

Hi,

Thank you Monty and Alex for taking the time to comment, my apologies for not attaching a copy of the file in my original post.
 
Alex's post will be worth investigating further  - as the problem began to occur after I made camera shutter speeds beyond 1 second, with bulb I could only guess the exposure and tried to match the shutter speed to the audio signal from the back at 2 and 4 second exposures.

regards Richard


* StillLifeStudy_3.jpg (263.06 KB, 1202x902 - viewed 116 times.)
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.127 seconds with 18 queries.